.
It won't matter what bible one looks at today, changes have been made in the script to suit a congregation or groups opinion of the
matter of the word and its content. Could it be because of transgressed teachings, and violated laws of the Creator, one would seem
to be held back from what is necessary to move forward in faith, and in turn would put one farther behind in learning about this
reality through biblical teachings
. Sure there are claims that there is only one way to get to Heaven,or God, yet one can find many
ways in order to obtain understanding of what, and even if Heaven is of a reality, and a greater understanding of the people of this
world only if one reads the Word, or wooords for themself.

You don't have to be religous to have heard, you must read to succeed.
Transgressed: to go beyond limits set or prescribed by.
Violated: to fail to show proper respect for.

Here is a look at the same script from the said same book but are from two different groups. In no way should
alterations made in Biblical books prevent someone from reading and learning from different text themselves
to understanding what the religious rave is all about.....sure the first time one reads the book one may not
understand, but the second time the Bible is read a better understanding starts to develop. A good place to
start reading is Proverbs, because a pro is not a con, and a pro verb is a positive action, and positive
action should be taken when dealing with what is best for a person and their reality.
Standard Edition 1958
Isaiah 26.17

17 Like as a woman with child,
that draweth near the time for
her delivery, is in pain, and
crieth out in her pangs;
so have
we been in thy sight
O Lord.
18 We have been with child we
have been in pain , we have as
it were brought forth wind;
we
have not wrought any
deliverance
in the earth
neither have
the inhabitants
of the world have fallen.
19 Thy dead men shall live,
together with my dead body
shall they arise.
Awake and
sing, ye that dwell in the dust:
for thy dew is as the dew of
herbs,
and the earth shall cast
out the dead.
Jewish text 1999
Isaiah 26.17

Like a woman with child approuching
childbirth,Writh and screaming in her
pangs,
So are we become because of You,
O Lord.
We were with chlld, we writhed
It is as though we had given birth to
wind;
We have won no victory on earth;
The inhabitants of the world have
not come to life!
Oh let Your dead revive!
let corpses arise!
Awake and shout for joy,
you who dwell in the dust!
For Your dew is like the dew of
fresh growth;
You make the land of the shades
come to life.

The Standard Edition script leans more towards the resurrection of jesus, and would not imply to a person to think
or even know that the dead belong to God like it explains in the first script, (
Oh let Your dead revive! Let corpses
arise
!
According to the gospel the dead do not belong to God, and when reading the script below one can see, that the
resurrection is mentioned in conjuction of the dead not belonging to God to emphasize the need for the said
resurrection, and this is so what? so that we should be fruit unto God? Does this mean we are grapes unto God or
are we olives? Or does it just mean that one becomes
the (Fruit):effect or consequence of the
action or operation,
of said reserrection.
Matthew 22-31
31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you By God,
saying,
32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but
of the living
Yet another question here is, have changes been made to suit each group and or practice, have we followed
the rules to this form of religous practice that seems to be a focus of many people, and peoples? Have we
changed script to suit ourselves, and by doing this have we transgressed the teaching of this Word..?
If the question is, have we followed the teachings, and are changes made in the Bible a good thing or a bad thing, can one
still obtain the "truth" through all of the changes, the answer would seem to be........? If one changes one word, it could
change the whole meaning of a passage. If one word can change the passage what about the changing of many words, or
even whole sentences, and to a point of removing sentences.
To get as close to the truth as possible, one might need to go back to a 1611 reprint or maybe a 1958 text, and cross
reference with the Jewish script (Study Bible), and other publication of the bible. It is interesting how this one
passage has change over the years and the words very from group to group, also one can see the simularitiy
between the song of my beloved, and the parable of the vineyard which is told in the gospel, and is present further in
this document.
For the vineyard of the Lord of Hosts is
the House of Israel,
And the seedlings he lovingly tended
Are the men of Judah.
And He hoped for justice,
But behold, in justice;
For equity,
But behold, iniquity.
(Who is said to be Gods Beloved? The only begotten Son? The beloved son, jesus, or the House of Isreal?)
The New Testament, tells how Jesus and his friends sang together - "When
they had sung the hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives" Gospel of
matthew 26:30. jesus ascended to heaven from the Mt of Olives as recorded in
the book of Acts 1:9-12. It will be the Mt of Olives to which he is to return as
stated in the book of Acts 1:11 and Zechariah 14:4.
John 15: 1-6
Jesus said, "
I am the true vine, my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch
of mine
that bears no fruit, he takes away, and every branch that does bear
fruit
he prunes, that it may bear fruit. I am the vine you are the branches. He
who abides in me, and I in
him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from
him
you can do nothing. If a man does not abide in me, he is cast forth as a
branch and withers; and the blades are gathered, and thrown into the fire and
burned."

Standard Edition 1611- 1958- uses beloved, no mention of lover.
Good News Bible 1993 - beloved is now a friend and his vineyard, no mention of lover.
Watch Tower 1984 - let me sing to my beloved one, no mention of lover
luke 3: 21-22
Now when all the people were baptized and when Jesus also had been
baptized, and was praying. The heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit
descended upon him in bodily form as a dove, and a voice came from heaven,
"
Thou art my beloved son; with thee I am well pleased."
"In other research it is said that Lucifer was the most loyal lover of God, (Lover:
ardent follower) and maybe still is, a legend believed by some and not by others. In
short, the legend speaks of how when God created the angels he commanded them
to pay worship to no one but Himself (God). Then, creating man, he commanded
the angels to bow in reverence to this most noble of his works, but Lucifer refused -
because of his pride. According to the research of this matter, it was because
Lucifer loved and adored God so deeply and intensely that he could not bring
himself to bow before anything else. Lucifer refused to bow down to something
inferior to him (since he was made of the fire, and man was made from the earth).
And it was for that, that he was expelled to earth, condemned to exist here until the
end, apart from The One he revered, The One he was command to worship from the
start. It was all of his being to adore, and be a true lover of God, cast to earth, now
living among that which he thinks is inferior.
My beloved had a vineyard
A song of my lover about his vineyard.
Definition
lover
: an ardent
follower.
ardent: characterized
by warmth of feeling
typically expressed in
eager zealous support
or activity:
Fiery, Hot, Burning.
Let me sing for my beloved
Jewish Study Bible 1999

Isaiah 5
He broke the ground, cleared it of
stones,
And planted it with choice vines.
On a fruitful hill.
He built a watchtower inside it,
He even hewed a winepress in it:
For he hoped it would yield
grapes.
Instead, it yielded wild grapes.
"Now, then,
Dwellers of Jerusalem
And men of Judah,
You be the judges
Between Me and My vineyard:
What more could have been
done for My vineyard
That I failed to do in it?
Why, when I hoped it would yield grapes,
Did it yield wild grapes?
"Now I am going to tell you
What I will do to My vineyard"
I will remove its hedge,
That it may be ravaged:
I will break down its wall,
That it may be trampled.
And I will make it a desolation
It shall not be pruned or hoed,
And it shall be over grown with briers
and thistles,
And I will command the clouds To drop
no rain on it.
Another outlook would be that Lucifer wanted to be the God and in the attempt to become the God, he was
expelled from Heaven. Cast down to earth with his third of angels, and now runs about earth putting evil into
mens hearts, or is it that Lucifer is now in Hell to rule as the bad boy and to rule all the bad people, when they
die, and still methology would seem abundant with stories of the Devil.
Olive tree:
Mediterranean evergreen
tree cultivated for its

drupaceous fruit that is
an important food and
source of oil
(A new winepress to make a new wine?)
A look into sour grapes

(Isaiah 24-5
For the earth was defiled
Under its inhabitants;
Because they transgressed teachings,
Violated laws,
Broke the ancient covenant. That is why a
cruse consumes the earth,
And its inhabitants pay the penalty;
That is why earth's dwellers have dwindled,
And but few men are left,
The new wine fails,
The vine languishes;
And all the merry hearted sigh.
Stilled is the merriment of timbrels
,

Ended the clamor of revelers,
Stilled the merriment of lyres.
They
drink their wine without song;
Liquor tastes bitter to the drinker.
Towns are broken, empty;
Every house is shut, none enter;
Even over wine, a cry goes up in the
streets:
The sun has set on all joy,
The gladness of the earth is banished.
Desolation is left in the town
And the gate is battered to ruins.
For thus shall it be among the peoples
In the Midst of the earth:
As when the olive tree is beaten out,
Like gleanings when the vintage is
over
.
What is this to mean about the beloved? is it a test in the planted vineyard? Everything about the vineyard is said to be of truth with in its construction. Has
man derived a truth, only to obtained the opposite of what the truth was intended to purpose due to thier own standards and by doing so, making the truth a
lie, is it a trangression of the teachings of the Word.? In a way it sounds of sorts as in the day of Job.

(Transgressed Teachings)

Through out the years, led like lambs to his slaughter to drink of his blood and eat of his flesh, for it is said that jesus is the way the truth and the life, and
even when it states in the Old Testement that we should not eat the
blood of the flesh in and manner, for the blood of the flesh is life, we are raised to
believe that in order to obtain
life, and not become one of the dead, we must except jesus the beloved of God, and eat of his flesh and drink of his
blood
. to obtain life, What is the question, is the gospel the way, and the new beginning, or is it the cut off........?
Jeremiah 11;15

Why should My beloved be in My House,
"Who executes so many vile designs?
The
sacral flesh will pass away from you,
john 12-28 jesus prayed Father, glorify my name, then god glorified it and would glorify it again.
john 6: 53
Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man (the beloved son of god) and drink his
blood, you have no life in you"
Exult: Glory
The Lord named you"Verdant olive tree,
Fair, with choice fruit."
For you exult while performing your evil
deeds.
verdant : unripe in experience or judgment
And its boughs are broken.
The Lord of Hosts, who planted you, has
decreed disaster for you,
because of the
evil wrought
by the House of Israel and the
House of Judah
But with a great roaring sound
He has set it on fire,
who angered Me by sacrificing to Baal.
He took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave to them. They all drank of it. He said to them, "This is my
blood
of the new covenant, which is poured out for many. Most certainly I tell you, I will no more drink of the fruit
of the vine, until that day when I drink it a new in the Kingdom of God." When they had sung a hymn, they went out
to the
Mount of Olives.
The Lord informed me, and I knew---
Then You let me see their deeds.
This is one of the Gospels Gems in describing jesus and the slaughter of the lamb
For I was like a docile lamb
Led to the slaughter;
I did not realize
That it was against me
They fashioned their plots:
"Let us destroy the tree with its fruit,"
Let us cut him off from the land of the living.
That his name be remember no more!"
O Lord of Hosts, O just Judge,
Who test the thoughts and the mind,
Let me see Your retribution upon them,
For I lay my case before you.
It is believed that this is Jeremiah portraying himself as a lamb led to slaughter, the
victim of a conspiracy, a tree that is cut down, pleading directly to God as though he
were in a court of law to demand that God bring those who persecute him to justice
The parabale of the vineyard and the Song of the beloved and his vineyard, or was that
lover, are of the same. The cast of characters has grown in the parable of the vineyard, were
there is now servents, and the son of the vineyard, and some husbandmen, This would
seem to be adding to what was already written, and it was said not to add to that which was
given. Why this particular Song and parable, Hmm...
Script being looked at is in the dark red
which extends to the bottom of the page
Theory Reference from gospel
john 14.6
It is said that jesus is the
way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Lev 17.14
For
blood is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life there of: therfore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye
shall eat the
blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosever eateth it shall be
cut off.
John 6: 53
Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man (the beloved son of god) and drink his
blood, you have no life in you"
Manner: a way of acting or proceeding: a group united by common traits or interests: kind, sort
matthew 26-27
27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
28 For this is my
blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
29 But I say unto you, I will not drink hence forth
of this fruit of the vine, untill that day when I drink it new with you in ;my
Father's kingdom.
john 14
Let not your heart be trouble; ye believe in God, believe also in me.
2 In my
Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a
place for you.
3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again,
and receive you unto myself; that
where I am, there ye may be also.
1611 reprint
Isaiah 24-5
Changed the new wine fails to the new wine mourneth,
Watch Tower
Isaiah 24-5
The
new wine has gone into mourning
Good News Bible
Isaiah 24-5
The grapevines wither,
and wine is becoming scarce.
Deut 4-35 - The Lord alone is God there is none beside Him.
Parable of the Vineyard - gospel new testament
Looking at the parable of the vineyard from the gospel one can see the similarities to the Song of the
Beloved. In the gospel you get a brutal story of a group of individuals who did not give to the lord of the
vineyard when the season came around. Enter the son and there would be no doubt who this character is,
and in other gospel script it mention beloved son. It doesn't take a genius to see a copycat of the Old
Testament script, yet the stranger thing about it is..... the Old Testament tells on the new testament.
luke 20-9
Parable of the vineyard
A certain man planted a vineyard, and let forth to husbandmen, and went into a far country for a long time.
And at the season he sent a servant to the husbandmen, that they should give him of he fruit of the vineyard: but the husbandmen beat him, and sent him away empty.
And again he sent another servant: and they beat him also, and entreated him shamefully, and sent him away empty.
And again he sent a third: and they wounded him also, and cast him out.
Then said the lord of the vineyard, What shall I do?
I will send my beloved son: it may be they will reverence him when they see him.
But when the husbandmen saw him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, this is the heir: come lets kill him, that the inheritance may be ours.
So they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. What shall the lord of the vineyard do unto them?
He shall come and destroy these husbandmen, and shall give the vineyard to others, And when they heard it, they said God forbid.
And he beheld them and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner?
Yes, the stone that was rejected........? the beloved? the beloved son?.................?
Standard Edition 1924
So what else is left to say about the new wine
Here are other example of the vineyard script
After everything was said and done the old testament tells of how the olive tree is beaten out and the vintage is over. Yet still even though
it does say the
new wine fails and the vine languishes, and that the changes are evident in the scripts, christains will continue to
believe jesus is lord, and god, so thats is why there is more, yes indeed,..............

In the next 2 research project we will see a test unfold, a test which has been told for thousand of years, a test made out to be a truth, in this
time where they say a bad thing is good, and a story which will say a good thing is bad, the test of those who are among the prisoners. See
from a Old Testament script which exposes a test and will ask...... where are our loyalties, and, are they with God or will one transgress to a
man. A test from a beginning, a choice between God or His vineyard.
The prophet Isaiah concludes the song with a description which informs us that its
Gods vineyard, we are the seedlings and the men of this song are wild grapes the
men of Judah.......or is it?
mourneth: someone filled with or expressing grief or sadness, especially over a death; someone who mourns
Fails: to not achieve a particular goal.
In order to study the word one needs a dictionary, with out a dictionary how is one to know what the word means. Sure
you could stick to the curriculum, yet what has been lost from that concluded study with an answer of
blood and flesh
to eat, and the promise of a room in the House of God which is said to be filled with many mansions? With
the jesus
as the vine
, the beloved son of god, the truth the way and the life, the story unfolds into something new, taken from
what was from the old to learn the grass may not be greener on the other side.
matthew 5-17
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, of the prophets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
19 Whosoever there fore shall break one of these least comandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least
in the kingdom of heaven; but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
It would seem that nothing else need to be done in the vineyard. God did everything right what more could He
have done, oh yes of course......implement a gospel....what for? the script says what more could have been.....
The New Wine Fails, and the vine languishes, the vintage is over.
Fifth Book of Moses
Deuteronomy 13


1 Be careful to observe only that which I enjoin upon you;
neither add to it nor take away
from it
.
2 If there appears among you a prophet or a dream-
diviner and he gives you a sign or a
portent,
3 saying : "let us follow and worship another god" whom you have not experienced even if the
sign or portent that he named to you comes true,
4 do not heed the words of that prophet or that dream-
diviner, for the Lord your God is
testing
you to see whether you really love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul.
5
Follow none but the Lord your God, and revere none but Him; observe His commandments alone,
and heed only His orders; worship none but Him, and hold fast to Him.
6 As for that prophet or dream-divener,
he shall be put to death; for he urged disloylty to
the Lord your God
.......
Portent: an indication or omen of something about to happen, esp. something momentous.
Diviner: Of, relating to, emanating from, or being the expression of a deity
john 14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but (by) through me."
matt 16:24 Jesus said to his disciples: “If anyone wants to come after me, let him disown himself and pick up his cross and follow me.
For whoever save his life will lose it; but
whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
AND THEN
The Bible is a big book, and there are lots of them. Many people have said one gets what they get from it, to each his own. Isn't it
funny that its not our own, yet we use it as our own, and still it remains
His.The reason His has been mentioned is because hasn't it
been noticed when reading the gospel, and that is to say when jesus is talking about "god" jesus addresses "god" as "
him who
sent me
" the strange thing about that is, him is not capitalized. Most of those loyal to a Creator would use a capital when
addressing their Lord as Him, He, and His
. Since "him who sent me" him not being in caps is used, would this pretain to
God or god? When reading the gospel it does seem a twitch right away to notice that this seems to not talk about God but some
other god, knowing that
Him should be capitalized.
john 6:39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.
Not all reference to this script failed to capitalize, 2 out of 18 Bibles viewed had kept loyal to proper capitalization when addressing
Him.
As trivial as a capital letter might be, to some it would seem disrepectful if someone would presented a writing with jesus and no
capital, or the son of man, or the son of god with out capitals. Or perhaps the use of the disiples names with out caps, matthew,
mark, luke, john, paul...... this would not show respect to these men and would leave a reader wondering if its writer even
recognizes the disiples as men of significance, if only to point out something about him.....I mean
Him, by sticking to the structure
of the Word and its associated recongnition to the Creator.
The Beginning To The End, Then back Again
Romans chapter 7 talks about a woman and her marriage, if her husband is not dead and she remarries she is a adulteress according to the Law. If
her husband has died and she remarries she is not a adulteress, this is because she is free from the Law. The passage goes on to say in verse......
4 Wherefore, my brethren,
ye also are become dead to the law by the body of christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who
is raised from the dead
, that we should bring forth fruit unto God
So by the body of christ there is no exception or restrictions to the law,.and now one can have a commitment to another who was
raised from the dead (jesus)?
There are many scripts in the new testament that could go here to show a Violation of a Law, and an understanding of disloyalty, yet it would take alot of reading so just a couple
of examples of diversion of loyalty have been presented. Further in this document one can see by the scripts presented that things have been added to, and taken away from a
Word that should not have changed.
Trangressed Teachings or illiterate Understanding?
Through the years the Bible has gone through many changes. What is said about changing things in the Bible can be found in
Deuteronomy which is one of the five Books of Moses. Judaism and Christianity are of the same text but they are not. Reading both
books one can see that there are differences. Now since Old School is said to be the rule and it should be believed that the Jewish
Scribes and Scholars have stayed true to the Word, we will first lead off with this first script from Deuteronomy out of the Jewish Study
Bible
Definitions
Dead: idle, having no exception or restrictions, lacking power of significance or effect.
Fruit: the effect or consequence of and action or operation.
Still there is more to this that has not been presented, only a outline of a Violation of a Law, and Transgressed Teaching of a Word
that is said to be from The One, God
Words in the Holy Bible have been changed in the above Duteronomy script, the word revere has been changed to fear, and test has been
changed to proveth, if one has a Bible handy it may have different changes than the ones mention, and like its been said Bibles differ from
group to group. Now to say everyone looks at it differently would be true, yet the question is wouldn't our differences instil a prejudice where a
prejudice should not be, only because of changes made to the Word that should not have changed at all.
True: being in
accordance with
the actual state of
affairs

Choice: the act of
choosing:said to be the
best part: care in selecting.
Mount: Mt: a high hill
jesus is the vine his followers are the branches, he will drink hence forth of this fruit of the vine, in that day when he drinks it new with them in.......
Job 28:28
He said to man "see! Fear (awe) of the Lord is wisdom; to shun evil is understanding."
Isaiah 42:8 I am the Lord that is my name, and my glory will I not give to another,neither my
praise to graven images.
Graven: impress or fix
matthew 21

33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planded a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and diiged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and
went into a far country:
34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might recieve the fruits of it.
35 And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first; an they did unto them like wise.
37 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, this is heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
40 When the lord therfore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
41They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the gruits in their seasons.
mark 12
1And he began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set an hedge about it, and digged a
place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country.
2 And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the vineyard.
3 And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty.
4 And again he sent unto them another servant and at hime they cast stones, and wounded him in head, and sent him away
shamefully handled.
5 And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some.
6 Having yet therefore one son, his
well beloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son.
7 But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours.
8 And they
took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard.
9 What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? he will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto
others.
So what does the gospel have to say about the enjoining?
Enjoining: a judicial remedy issued in order to prohibit a party from doing or continuing to do a certain activity
And still with enough research one can find many legends of Lucifier
The New Wine Fails, and the vine languishes, the vintage is over.
Holy BS (Biblical Scriptures) Guild